SOCIAL SECURITY GIVING AWAY TOO MUCH MONEY?

It seems everyone is loading up to take aim at the integrity of the Social Security disability program.  Senate investigations into Social Security are nothing new but usually they are held by the Senate Finance Committee.  NOSSCR's Social Security Forum reports in their September 2012 edition that on September 13 2012, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs held a 3 hour hearing on the quality of favorable disability decisions handed down by Administrative Law Judges. 

Here is what disturbs me about this "investigation":
  • The Senate subcommittee "investigated" only favorable decisions.  This reinforces the idea that Social Security's main focus is not making sure that everyone who deserves Social Security disability gets it; the main focus is making sure that nobody gets Social Security disability that isn't supposed to.
  • Rarely, if ever, does a government committee or subcommittee investigate unfavorable decisions--not even judges who deny 90 percent or more of all claims are investigated.
  • The minority report recommended that the government (Social Security) be represented during disability hearings.  Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) stated his support for a government representative (an attorney) at hearings.
If Social Security adopts the idea of placing a government attorney in Social Security disability hearings, it will not only drive up the cost of Social Security, it will fundamentally change the hearing process.  At present the hearings are non-adversarial.  You don't have two opposing attorneys with one arguing that the claimant should get Social Security disability while the other one argues that he should not.  If that changes then the entire procedure will become more complex, more difficult, more costly and more time consuming. 

Social Security disability award rates have already fallen dramatically over the past 12 months.  Apparently, the government has decided that they have not fallen enough.  Judges are being "retrained," pressured, prodded and now "investigated" for giving too many favorable awards to disabled claimants--for whom SSA disability is the only financial lifeline they have left.

If government lawyers are indeed placed in Social Security hearings, you can expect a much more active role of the federal district courts, which have jurisdiction at the next level of appeal after a hearing by an Administrative Law Judge.  If government attorneys direct more unfavorable hearing decisions, attorneys for the claimants will no doubt file more federal court challenges because that is their only recourse.  This will add up to 3 years of additional waiting for the claimant, in addition to the 18 months he/she has already waited just to get a hearing.

 Apparently, there are those in government who believe that administrative law judges with bleeding hearts are giving away Social Security awards wholesale.  They may be, but I'd like to meet one of them.  I haven't seen one yet!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I NEED HELP WHILE WAITING FOR DISABILITY

"I need help.  I've filed for Social Security disability months ago.  How can I survive until my case gets settled?" This is a good question.  If you are disabled, not working and have little or no income--survival is the question.  It may take months or years for Social Security to decide your case.  What can you do.  Here are some sources of help you may want to consider: FOOD STAMPS :  Contact your county's Department of Human Resources.  In Madison County, it's located at 2206 Oakwood Avenue NW.  Phone (256) 427-6000.  Website:   http://dhr.alabama.gov/counties/county_results.aspx?id=Madison MORTGAGE PAYMENTS :  Contact "Hardest Hit Alabama" at www.hardesthitalabama.com   or call 1-877-497-8182. LOW COST MEDICAL CARE (DOCTORS) : Click on the link below for a list of low cost clinics near you.  http://www.needymeds.org/free_clinics.taf?_function=list&state=al UTILITY BILLS OR OTHER NEEDS: ...
Read more

YOU EARN SSDI BENEFITS - THEY ARE NOT WELFARE.

I speak truthfully when I tell people that Social Security disability is not welfare.  You paid for it, you earned it.  Claim it. Here's why the Social Security disability program is not welfare: 1)  You paid FICA tax every day you worked.  FICA stands for "Federal Insurance Contribution Act."  It's actually a Social Security tax.  It came out of every paycheck you earned. 2)  You were forced to purchase Social Security disability insurance (SSDI) by the US government.  You were not given a choice.  This is a government sponsored disability insurance plan, just like you would purchase from an insurance company.  The only difference, it was mandatory--you were forced to buy it, no choice. 3)  The Social Security program is self-financing.  It is not paid for out of the general US treasury.  FICA taxes come out of your paycheck, are matched by your employer, and go into a special trust fund.  When you become dis...
Read more

HOW TO GET DISABILITY BENEFITS AT AGE 50

Image
If you are applying for Social Security disability benefits, it is more likely that you will be approved if you are over age 50.  Why? Because of the medical-vocational guidelines.  These "grid rules" make it easier for persons who are of advanced age or who are approaching advanced age. The factors which Social Security must consider in determining whether a claimant is disabled are: age education prior work experience residual function capacity ( See definition below)* When all 4 of these factors are favorable, it is much more likely to get a favorable decision on your disability claim.  (See my separate post on getting a Medical Source Statement, which addresses the residual function capacity). Definition of "Residual Functional Capacity' (RFC):  This is the maximum amount of work related activity that the claimant can do:  sitting, standing, walking, pushing/pulling, lifting, bending, etc.  T he RFC is key to getting a favorable d...
Read more